Nowadays, personal computers are so common that many households have several. At my place, we have two desktop machines, one laptop computer and a tablet computer, with another tablet purchase contemplated. If you consider "smart phones" computers -- and a pretty good case for that can be made -- we have two of those. So the tally comes to six computers for two people, or three per capita. I suspect this isn't unusual in middle-class America.
But for people older than 50, say, personal computers were a Big Deal when they first reached the market, especially for someone like me who needed to crunch numbers on a fairly large scale.
Back then, most "graphics" was in the form of X's and other symbols arranged on a screen, though before long one could buy a graphics card to insert on the motherboard, this allowing linear graphic displays. Remember the Hercules board, anyone? Today, of course, the graphical interface is the real computer, so far as the average user is concerned.
Apple II computers were too memory-limited for me, but the IBM PC had real potential. The machine shown above looks like the one I bought once I landed a contract to develop a software system using the APL programming language. The potential on-board memory was 640 KB, but I started with about half that because just about everything to do with personal computers 30 years ago (I got mine in May, 1983) was really expensive, especially memory (over the next couple of years I up-graded in steps to the maximum). My system, including a dot-matrix printer cost me around $3,500 -- about $8,200 in 2013 dollars according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator. A box of 10 floppy disks was something like $49, if memory serves.
My new machine wasn't bottom-of-the-line, however. Like the one in the picture, it had two floppy disk drives -- and they were double-sided drives so that my floppies could hold twice as munch data as earlier, single sided ones could. About the time I bought my PC, IBM came out with a PC that had an actual hard drive that could hold a massive 10 MB of data. (These capacities are microscopic compared to what a typical computer holds today.)
Even though I have fond memories of my first computer, I would never ever want to go back to using one like it. But in its day it was a marvel that helped me earn a living.
The first personal computer I used was a Commodore PET: I programmed it in Basic to run a lab experiment. I showed it off once to a schoolboy at a lab "open day": he said words to the effect of "that's the first time I've seen a computer use that isn't despicably silly".
ReplyDeletedearieme -- You know all about this, I'm pretty sure, but for younger readers:
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of the Pet, back in those days there was a fascinating array of computer brands, operating systems and CPUs jockeying for market share. When the IBM PC hit the stores, the prestige of those three magic letters soon made it the computer of choice for business and, therefore, a standard. By the time I got mine, it was becoming almost the standard, and the big deal for machine testers in Byte and other magazines was whether or to what extent other Intel-based computers could run IBM PC software. The problem was the BIOS, which was proprietary. What broke the dam for IBM's rivals was a BIOS reverse-engineered in terms of function by programmers who were ignorant of the IBM microcode.
Fascinating times, those!
The first one that really impressed me was an Apple II that someone gave my wife when we lived in Oz. We bought a Mac soon after for ourselves and I ordered Macs for use at work; I used Mathematica a fair bit then. I reluctantly converted to PCs years later when the whole of our lab swapped. Partly it was cost, partly software availability and compatibility, and partly it was because Apple went through a spell of delivering unreliable hardware.
ReplyDelete