That is correct. And I then began to think about the nature of movie posters, something I hadn't done before, given that I am only a tepid film fan.
Most mainline movies feature actors and actresses who are known to significant numbers of the potential audience. They are called "stars." Therefore, to entice viewers of a new film, publicity often (usually?) features those stars.
So it is with movie posters. In Peak's day and for three or more decades before, movie posters prominently displayed illustrations featuring the film's leading cast. That was an important factor in the design, though not absolutely essential. Once a theme regarding emphasis was established, the illustrator (along with the studio's marketing and publicity people) might add other visual details and certainly consider alternative poster layouts.
Below is an early Peak poster preceded by some posters for important movies in the years before in order to provide a little context for Peak's achievement. I do not identify the illustrators of those other posters because I didn't bother to research so thoroughly. Also bear in mind that a successful film would likely be given a number of alternative poster designs and themes, so the ones shown here are not necessarily the original or definitive versions. But they are suggestive of the genre of the 1950s and early 1960s.
Kelly was the big star, O'Connor was known as a supporting actor and Reynolds was new. Apparently more was thought needed than only Gene Kelly's face, so all three were featured. That said, this poster didn't give much of a clue as to what the movies was about. Perhaps that it was an MGM musical was all the publicity folks needed.
Posters often came in different formats for the same film. This is an extreme vertical example that used elements found in more conventionally shaped alternatives.
The famous Elizabeth Taylor is featured to the visual exclusion of others.
This design is more "arty" than most for those days.
Probably not the original design, but this does show how a major star could be featured. A dramatic element in the film is included.
This was not the first Ben-Hur film, as it and another were based on a well-known book. Perhaps for that reason, stars were not featured in the illustration -- only the famous chariot race in the main image.
Several important actors were in this film, and they are in the small images. As with Ben-Hur, the name "Lawrence of Arabia" was known to the general public and therefore featured.
Three famous stars, so all get the same visual billing.
Peak was an excellent, style-setting illustrator at this time. But he too followed (had to?) the convention os featuring the main stars while including visual bits from the film.
Peak's art that was used in various ways to publicize the movie.
2 comments:
Nice follow up, Don. Bernie Fuchs told me that Peak encouraged him to do movie posters, which paid far more than magazine illustrations. Fuchs tried a few but did not like them. By that time, the Hollywood star system had replaced the old studio factory system, so the layout for movie posters was decided by negotiations between lawyers and press agents. Illustrators were instructed, "the star's face must be in the upper right or left corner, above the title and taking up X% of the total surface size. Here is the product the star must be holding in his or her hand. Here is a list of the other cast members who must be included, some just the face and some full figure, but they can be no larger than Y." That may account for some of the changes you note in the evolution of poster design. It looks to me like Peak wielded far more creative control in his early excellent posters, from My Fair Lady to Camelot. By the 1970s Fuchs felt it was like wearing handcuffs, while Peak apparently made his peace with the process.
David -- Thank you for the Fuchs information (my auto-spell-check just changed the word to "Such" ... sigh!). Ditto for confirming my speculation about the environment illustrators faced in Hollywood.
Post a Comment